Skip Navigation
This table is used for column layout.
Planning Board Minutes February 24, 2014
2/24/14

These minutes are not verbatim – they are the secretary’s interpretation of what took place at the meeting. - Open Meeting Law, G.L. c. 30A§22.

Board Members:  Marc Garrett, Paul McAlduff, Tim Grandy, and Malcolm MacGregor
Staff Members:   Lee Hartmann and Robin Carver
Recording Secretary:  Eileen Hawthorne

Administrative Notes:

Minutes: None

Form A Plans*:
A4487 – Joshua and Sarah Bows, 7 Park Ave, Map 48, Lot 49-104A – Divide into Lots 49-104-1 and 49-104-2 (per ZBA Case No. 3727)

A4488/B564 – J & M Properties Nominee Trust/Danielson, 1432 Old Sandwich Road, Map 52, Lot 32-2 – Divide into Lots 32-89, 32-90, 32-91, and 32-92
Marc Garrett moved for the Board to determine that A4487 and A4488 were entitled to endorsement:  Malcolm MacGregor, second; the vote was unanimous (4-0).

Conceptual Review       Modification off Camelot/Caleb Drives
The Board received the following documentation* for review of this case:
Proposed Building and Parking Plan dated 2/12/14
Aerial Site Photo
Atty. Richard Serkey presented a conceptual plan for the Iantosca family that would rescind a previously approved 12 lot subdivision (1983, modified in 1988) that has not been developed and combine the land into one lot.  The emergency access for the subdivision would also be rescinded.   The site could then be developed under a 2002 bylaw amendment to Section 205-17 that allows more than one structure on a lot in the Light Industrial (LI) zone.  Lot 55-7A was created through the Approval Not Required (ANR) process and a new access easement would be outlined in a deed.  The drainage areas are not located on the ground where they are depicted on the recorded plans and documents and amendments would be drafted to define what is actually on the ground.   
Bill Shaw, Associated Engineers, Inc., indicated that utilities and drainage were installed and have not been used for the last 25 years.  In 1989 the drainage was upgraded for all the lots and the roadway to drain into one location.  The infrastructure will be the responsibility of the owner.  The first structure on the site is proposed as a 39,000 sq. ft., flex building.  The entrance to Caleb Drive will be widened to two lanes with a landscaped island.  
Jon Henson, Landscape Architect, stated that they will retain as much existing vegetation as possible on three sides of the proposed building with supplemental plantings of deciduous trees at the rear corners of the building.  Along the front of the site, trees with a low canopy consisting of ornamental shrubs and grasses will be planted in the parking lot islands. At each curb cut there will be plantings to create a small entry statement.  In the median islands, low canopy shrubs, ornamental grasses and perennials will be planted.  Other areas will be seeded with a natural mix.   
Lee Hartmann noted that a formal site plan review will be presented at the next meeting.   Mr. Hartmann stated that the chain link fence proposed around the drainage area was not necessary.  
Mr. Shaw stated that the reason for the chain link fence was the potential for ponding in the drainage area.  He explained that the drainage system will have four ft. sumps and fore bays before it infiltrates into the retention basin.  
Tim Grandy was supportive of tying into the existing sewerage system rather than installing an on-site sewer treatment facility.  
Malcolm MacGregor asked how large the parcel would be once the subdivision is rescinded.     
Mr. Shaw replied that it would be around 30 acres and the developer will work to create a master plan for the site.  
Mr. Hartmann noted that the Board will have to make a finding that it is a unified complex in order to allow further structures on the site.  He also stated that as long as the uses are allowed, a traffic study would not be required.  
Atty. Serkey noted that a formal rescission of the subdivision may not need a public hearing as none of the property has been deeded out and no mortgages have been granted.   

Conceptual Review – Lois Roberts Revocable Trust
        108 Sandwich Road, Map 47, Lot 24B
        RDD for two new residential lots
The Board received the following documentation* for review of this case:
Preliminary RDD Plan for Lois Roberts dated 1/10/14
Atty. Robert Betters reviewed the history of the parcels (24A, 24B and 23) which were originally held by Lois Roberts.  The original house on 24A was separated and subsequently sold.  Lot 24B consists of approximately 1.5 acres and would be divided for two structures and lot 23 which consists of 6 acres and would be conveyed to Forges Farm Inc., a non-profit organization that has been established to purchase open space in the area for conservation purposes.  There is a potential for the owners of the two residential lots to have access through existing trails to the Eel River.       
Mark Flaherty, Flaherty and Stefani, Inc., presented the site plan for the two lot RDD with open space.  The project will have to be reviewed by the Conservation Commission as the proposed driveway will cross a small isolated wetland.  A replication area was shown on the plan.  The driveway would be 14 ft. wide with a 1 ft. berm on each side.  An easement will be granted for an existing driveway on  the lot that is used by an abutter.  There are some wetland and natural habitat areas on lot 23 as well as existing trails.  A small rain garden will capture drainage on the site.  Buffer areas will be provided along abutting lots and the sight distances along Sandwich Road are adequate.  
Lee Hartmann stated that this was a good RDD with a large amount of open space.  
Malcolm MacGregor asked if the existing driveway that provides access for the abutter could be combined with the proposed driveway.  
Atty. Betters stated that combining the driveways would create a liability issue, but it might be possible to convey the portion of the lot with the driveway to the abutter.  
Marc Garrett was supportive of the concept, but expressed some concerns regarding the soil on the site.  
Paul McAlduff was supportive of the proposed RDD with open space.  

ZBA 3738 – Matthew Squillante and Gabrielle Zazzarino
        64 Off Billington Street, Map 27, Lot 128A
        Special Permit to waive the front or rear setback requirements in order to construct a three-car garage
The Board received the following documentation* for review of this case:
Staff Report
Fire Department Comments dated 2/14/14
Locus map
Building Elevations
Septic Plan dated 2/9/04
Plan of Land in Plymouth MA 64 Off Billlington 2/4/14
Matthew Squllante presented his request to waive the setback requirements in order to construct a three car garage on his property.  Mr. Squillante stated that the way the existing house and garage are situated on the site makes it tight to maneuver.  The new garage would not be used for commercial purposes and will replace the existing garage and would allow for storage of household goods and vehicles.
Robin Carver noted that the area behind the location where the garage is proposed is open field and woodland.  The site also sits high on a hill and is isolated.  The staff report contained a condition that would limit the uses to those that are accessory to residential.  
Marc Garrett suggested adding language to the condition so the condition would read as follows:
As this property is within a residential neighborhood, the proposed garage shall only be used for accessory residential uses and not as a dwelling unit or units or for commercial business purposes.
Malcolm MacGregor moved for the Board to recommend approval to the Zoning Board of Appeals with the condition as amended:  Marc Garrett, second; the vote was unanimous (4-0).

B584 – Piney Wood Cranberry Co, Inc.
969 Federal Furnace Rd, Map 99, Lot 1C          
        Create 20 Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Certificates
Lee Hartmann announced that the review of B584 has been moved to March 17, 2014 at the request of the applicant.  
                
Other Business:
“Topics not reasonably anticipated by the Chair 48 hours in advance of the meeting.”

1820 Courthouse Update
Marc Garrett informed the Board that the Courthouse presentation is being shown to various public groups upon request.  The West Plymouth Steering Committee viewed the presentation last week.  The Advisory and Finance Committee voted 7-5 in favor of the Courthouse renovations.   

Paul McAlduff informed the Board that there will be a meeting tomorrow night (2/25) regarding moving forward with Plymouth South High School reconstruction.    

Tim Grandy moved to adjourn at 7:55 p.m.; Malcolm MacGregor, second; the vote was unanimous (4-0).

Respectfully Submitted:




Eileen Hawthorne                                                Approved:  March 3, 2014
Administrative Assistant